The sins scale in the evaluation of stability in patients with spinal metastasis / A escala sins na avaliação de doentes com metástase na coluna vertebral, relacionada à estabilidade / La escala sins en la evaluación de pacientes con metastasis en la columna vertebral, relacionada a la estabilidad

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the distribution of patients seen in the emergency care unit of the Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo in the categories "stable", "indeterminate" and "unstable" as classified by the SINS scale. Methods The medical charts of patients treated between May and September 2013 were reviewed. Patients with a diagnosis of spinal metastasis were analyzed and data on age, sex, primary tumor location, neurological status, and the presence and intensity of pain at rest and in movement were obtained. The SINS criteria were used to evaluate the radiological involvement of the spine. Results We included 81 patients with a mean age of 59.57 years; 32 (39.51%) men and 49 (60.49%) women. Breast (19.75%), prostate (18.52%) and lung (17.28%) were the most common primary tumor sites. Only 18 patients (22.22%) had a single lesion and 51 (62.96%) had 3 or more metastatic lesions. Of the total, 56 (69.14%) were of undetermined stability, 19 were stable (23.46%) and 6 were unstable (7.41%). Twenty-two (27.2%) presented neurological deficit in the physical examination. None of the patients with severe deficit, Frankel A or B, were stable according to the SINS classification. All unstable lesions presented with kyphotic and/or scoliotic deviation (p <0.001). Most patients with undetermined lesions (78.6%) and all patients with unstable lesions had mechanical pain (p = 0.001). Conclusion In this case series, there was a high rate of patients classified by the SINS scale as of undetermined instability (69.14%). There was a high number of patients with multiple metastases (62.96%), which was not considered a modifier of the SINS instability criteria and which needs to be the focus of future studies. Level of evidence IV; Case Series.

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a distribuição de doentes atendidos no pronto-socorro do Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo nas categorias "estável", "indeterminada" e "instável" pela escala SINS. Métodos Levantaram-se prontuários dos doentes atendidos entre maio e setembro de 2013. Foram avaliados os doentes com diagnóstico de metástase vertebral e obtidos dados sobre idade, sexo, localização primária, situação neurológica, presença e intensidade da dor no repouso e no movimento. Os critérios da escala SINS foram utilizados para pontuação do comprometimento radiológico da coluna. Resultados Foram incluídos 81 doentes com média de idade de 59,57 anos; 32 (39,51%) homens e 49 (60,49%) mulheres, sendo que a mama (19,75%), próstata (18,52%) e pulmão (17,28%) foram as localizações primárias mais comuns. Apenas 18 doentes (22,22%) apresentaram lesão isolada e 51 (62,96%) apresentaram 3 ou mais lesões metastáticas. Do total, 56 (69,14%) apresentaram coluna com estabilidade indeterminada; 19 (23,46%) estável e 6 (7,41%) instável. Vinte e dois (27,2%) apresentaram déficit neurológico ao exame físico. Dos doentes com déficit grave, Frankel A ou B, nenhum apresentou coluna estável através da classificação SINS. Todas as lesões instáveis apresentaram-se com desvio cifótico e/ou escoliótico (p<0,001). A maioria dos pacientes com lesões indeterminadas (78,6%) apresentou dor de caráter mecânico e todos os pacientes com lesão instável apresentaram dor mecânica (p=0,001). Conclusões Nessa série de casos, o uso da escala SINS teve uma taxa elevada de doentes com coluna classificada como indeterminada (69,14%). Há um número elevado de doentes com metástases múltiplas (62,96%), fato não considerado pela SINS como modificador nos critérios de instabilidade e que precisa ser alvo de novos estudos. Nível de evidência IV; Serie de casos.

RESUMEN Objetivo Evaluar la distribución de los enfermos en la unidad de primeros auxilios del Instituto del Cáncer de Estado de São Paulo en las categorías "estable", "indeterminada" e "inestable" por la escala SINS. Métodos Se levantaron historiales clínicos de los enfermos atendidos entre mayo y septiembre de 2013. Fueron evaluados los enfermos con diagnóstico de metástasis vertebral, y se obtuvieron datos sobre edad, sexo, localización primaria, situación neurológica, presencia e intensidad del dolor en reposo y en movimiento. Los criterios de la escala SINS se utilizaron para puntuación del compromiso radiológico de la columna. Resultados Fueron incluidos 81 pacientes con promedio de edad de 59,57 años; 32 (39,51%) hombres y 49 (60,49%) mujeres, siendo que la mama (19,75%), próstata (18,52%) y pulmón (17,28%) fueron las localizaciones primarias más comunes. Sólo 18 enfermos (22,22%) presentaron lesión aislada y 51 (62,96%) presentaron tres o más lesiones metastásicas. Del total, 56 (69,14%) presentaron columna con estabilidad indeterminada; 19 (23,46%) estable y 6 estable (7,41%) inestable. Veintidós (27,2%) presentaron déficit neurológico al examen físico. De los enfermos con déficit grave, Frankel A o B, ninguno presentó columna estable a través de la clasificación SINS. Todas las lesiones inestables se presentaron con desviación cifótica y/o escoliótica (p <0,001). La mayoría de los pacientes con lesiones indeterminadas (78,6%) presentó dolor de carácter mecánico y todos los pacientes con lesión inestable presentaron dolor mecánico (p = 0,001). Conclusiones En esta serie de casos, el uso de la escala SINS tuvo una tasa elevada de enfermos con columna clasificada como indeterminada (69,14%). Hay un número elevado de enfermos con metástasis múltiples (62,96%), hecho no considerado por la SINS como modificador en los criterios de inestabilidad y que necesita ser objeto de nuevos estudios. Nivel de evidencia IV; Serie de casos.

Correlation between the degree of correction of neuromuscular scoliosis and patient quality of life

OBJECTIVE: There are few data on patient satisfaction with surgery for the correction of neuromuscular scoliosis or on the correlation between patient satisfaction and the degree of curve correction achieved by surgery. Our aim was to determine the correlations between both patient satisfaction and perception of quality of life and the degree of curve correction. METHODS: We interviewed 18 patients and administered a questionnaire that collected social and economic data and information about functional ability, comorbidities and satisfaction. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests, Pearson correlation and paired t-tests. RESULTS: The mean correction achieved was 42.8%, i.e., 34.17 degrees. Early and late complication rates were low (11.1% each). Almost all of the patients (94.4%) were satisfied with the surgery, and expectations were met for 61.1% of them. Quality of life and aesthetics were improved in 83.4% and 94.4% of cases, respectively. No correlation was found between satisfaction and degree of correction. CONCLUSION: Our surgical results are similar to those of other studies with respect to the degree of correction and patient satisfaction. The disparity between satisfaction and fulfillment of expectations may be due to unrealistic initial expectations or misunderstanding of the objective of surgery. Our findings corroborate the hypothesis that satisfaction is multifactorial and not restricted to a quantitative goal. The satisfaction of patients who undergo operation for neuromuscular scoliosis does not depend directly on the degree of deformity correction. The relationship between satisfaction and the success of the correction procedure is complex and multifactorial.

Dermatology relevance to graduates from the Universidade Estadual de Campinas Medical School

AbstractBACKGROUND:Some research indicates that physicians do not dominate the expected dermatological content for the proper exercise of the profession. This fact compromises their diagnostic and therapeutic performance, generating unnecessary costs.OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of Dermatology and the knowledge acquired in the specialty during the undergraduate course in clinical practice of graduates at the State University of Campinas Medical School (FCM/UNICAMP).METHOD:A questionnaire with 22 closed questions and two open ones was electronically sent to physicians who had graduated more than 10 years ago and others for less than 10 years. In the first group, physicians were trained by the same curriculum and in the second group there were subjects trained by the old and the new curriculum.RESULTS:Of the 126 respondents, 83% had completed a specialization course. Among all, 82% did not study dermatology after graduation. The majority considered that Dermatology has high relevance in clinical practice, regardless of the group. There was a statistically significant difference between non-dermatologist doctors graduated for more than 10 years and those graduated for less than 10 years regarding confidence about lesion diagnosis, diagnostic investigation and treatment of skin diseases. Physicians who have graduated for a longer time feel more insecure in relation to patients with dermatoses. Concerning contributions offered by graduation program completion they prioritized outpatient care, ability to diagnose, knowledge of pathology, research and knowledge of lesions.CONCLUSION:This study has shown that Dermatology is relevant in medical practice and more recent graduates from the FCM/UNICAMP feel less insecure when treating a patient with dermatoses.